Pegasus row: Country having spyware for security not wrong, says SC
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said a country possessing spyware for security purposes is not wrong but using it against a civil society person will be looked into.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said a country possessing spyware for security purposes is not wrong but using it against a civil society person will be looked into.
The matter came up for a hearing at a special court in Kolkata on Monday afternoon, where the counsel of the victim’s parents submitted a written synopsis of his observations on the CBI probe into the matter so far and in that written submission, this particular allegation was made.
Following a plea over obscene content on OTT and social media, SC notes that these platforms have a social responsibility and issues a notice to the Centre.
The Supreme Court on Thursday granted an interim bail till May 8 to Vikas Yadav, who is serving a 25-year jail term in 2002 Nitish Katara murder case, to attend to his ailing mother who is said to be in a serious condition.
Posting the matter for final hearing on May 6 and 7, a bench of Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice Rajesh Bindal told the advocates appearing for the Gujarat government and the convicts to file a compilation of their submissions in the case.
Issuing a notice on the bail plea by Sanjay Singh, a bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Dipankar Datta sought a response from the Centre’s anti-money laundering agency.
The top court issues show cause notice to Anil Masih.
Supreme Court on Monday directed that the ballot papers and video recording of the election held on January 30, that have been taken into custody by the Registrar General of Punjab and Haryana High Court in pursuant of its order, be produced before it on February 20, 2024, at 2pm.
Staying the proceedings by the privilege committee, the bench issued notice to Lok Sabha secretariat (Privileges and Ethics Branch).
The constitution bench further held that the “deletion of the provision to Section 182(1) of the Companies Act permitting unlimited corporate contributions to political parties is arbitrary and violative of Article 14.”