SC ruling on bulldozer action: Mayawati seeks ‘Rule of Law By Law’
Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) supremo Mayawati, supporting the Supreme Court directives on bulldozer action, has sought the establishment of a 'Rule of Law by Law'.
Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) supremo Mayawati, supporting the Supreme Court directives on bulldozer action, has sought the establishment of a 'Rule of Law by Law'.
“Today, through the implementation of the rule of law, Uttar Pradesh has transformed its image," he remarked.
The CM, who was speaking at the convocation of Dr Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University here on Saturday in the presence of the Chief Guest Chief Justice of India Justice DY Chandrachud, highlighted the significance of good governance.
The CJI, in his address on the occasion of laying the foundation stone of court complexes at Delhi's Karkardooma, Shastri Park & Rohini Sector 26, said that every case filed before the court carries the hope of justice.
In the last one year, the Meetei community, an ethnic group to native Manipur, has been selectively targeted, attacked, isolated and victimized, it said.
The soundness of the historic ruling can be ‘judged‘ from the fact that for half a century now, various Division Benches of the apex court have not only reiterated the doctrine but expanded the base of the ‘basic structure‘ to include more liberal features into it. Democracy is being continually fortified, and its roots are being nourished with several subsequent decisions on the unfailing strength of Bharti ruling. The Court, by making explicit the earlier implicit basic postulates of the rule of law has arguably engraved our basic freedoms in stone, or, shall we say granite?
PM Meloni noted that the threats posed by climate change, terrorism, war and rapid digital transformations could only be addressed by greater international resolve.
Professionalizing the judiciary not only makes courts more trustworthy and respectable in the eyes of the people, but also enhances its capability to resolve disputes, and thus contributes to a more vibrant, prosperous community.
There are not too many countries where it would be considered acceptable for a 17-year-old to acquire a lethal weapon, inject himself into a volatile situation, then shoot three people who justifiably considered him a threat, killing two of them. But that’s precisely what the verdict in the Wisconsin trial of Kyle Rittenhouse conveys.
A CBI investigation under the supervision of the High Court must be made mandatory in all cases where the Central and State governments do not agree on such a course of action, says G RAMACHANDRA REDDY
