The Supreme Court on Friday asked Delhi High Court to expeditiously decide the bail plea of Sharjeel Imam charged under the stringent provisions of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in the February 2000 Delhi riots conspiracy case.
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday adjourned the hearing on a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking the removal of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and TradeMarks (CGPDTM).
Strongly condemning the rape and murder of trainee doctor in Kolkata's R.G. Kar Medical College, the Delhi High Court Bar Association resolved to wear white ribbon band on Wednesday as a mark of protest and to pay homage and respect to the victim and her family.
When contacted by our correspondent, Nasiar welcomed the decision of the Delhi High Court and expressed his gratitude for expeditious disposal of the case.
“My incarceration will have grave prejudicial implications as well as severe reputational damage,” the Delhi chief minister said in response to the ED's challenge to the trial court's decision granting him bail.
These provisions constitute a clear attack on 'personal liberty and clearly fall foul of Article 21 of the Constitution and are thus liable to be struck down.
It further said that states collect around one lakh crore rupees from four lakh temples but there are no similar provisions for Hindus. Thus, the Act offends Article 27.
The appellant shall attend the Court as and when the appeal is listed, he shall not contact or visit any of the victims
Terming the incident a 'PFI work', he alleged that the Pakistan intelligence agency ISI is funding to disrupt the peace in India.
The bench, during the hearing, observed that they cannot be impleaded if there is opposition.
