It begins with whispers in a London newspaper. Children have been found pale and listless, sporting strange wounds on their necks. They speak, in slurred fragments, of a “bloofer lady”—a beautiful woman who beckons to them in the night. Adults read the headlines and dismiss the details as embellishment. But in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, what we don’t understand often poses the greatest threat.

Stoker’s 1897 novel is widely remembered as a chilling tale of bloodlust and immortality. But look more closely, and you’ll find that its true power lies in what it withholds. The Count himself, for much of the novel, remains elusive—more presence than person. His menace unfolds not through confrontation, but through suggestion. The shadows lengthen; the facts blur; the truth resists resolution. Dracula is a story about fear, yes—but more precisely, it is about the fear of the unknown.

Advertisement

Lucy Westenra’s posthumous transformation into the so-called “bloofer lady” is one of the novel’s most unsettling episodes. Once a radiant young woman, she is slowly drained of life and resurrected as something unnamed, unknowable. The children who encounter her do not see a monster. They see a woman—beautiful, gentle, inviting—who leads them to the cemetery, then disappears into the mist. In their innocent mispronunciation, “beautiful” becomes “bloofer.” Their language, like their understanding, is limited. But their fear is real.

Stoker, always attuned to the tension between science and superstition, lets this mystery unfold through fragments: newspaper clippings, diary entries, letters. We are made to feel the confusion of those within the story. Why is Lucy wasting away? Why do transfusions fail? Why do none of the usual explanations suffice? The doctors cling to their instruments and theories, but what is afflicting Lucy lies beyond the reach of their tools. The fear deepens—not only because something terrible is happening, but because no one can say exactly what it is.

This is a deeply modern kind of horror where the Victorian society was placing its faith in reason, progress and empirical knowledge. The children’s testimony about the bloofer lady becomes a mirror held up to the adult world: they see clearly, if unclearly. Their words are not taken seriously until the bodies pile up and the myths take root. By the time Van Helsing and his companions confront the truth, it is too late for Lucy. The unknown has already entered their homes, their drawing rooms, their bedrooms.

Even the term “vampire” is withheld until the narrative is well underway. It arrives not as a label, but as a last resort—a word summoned only when all rational explanations fail. Stoker plays with language as much as with silence. The fear grows precisely because the characters cannot name it, and because the reader, too, must sit in the dark a little longer.

And then, as suddenly as she appeared, the bloofer lady is gone. Lucy is staked and buried, and her name is restored to purity. But the wound she leaves behind—on the children, on the city, on the narrative itself—never fully closes. The unknown, once glimpsed, does not vanish. It retreats, perhaps. It waits.

With society accelerating towards technological and intellectual sophistication, a paradox arises: the more that humanity unveils the mysteries of the natural world, the more it is confronted by the unsettling vastness of what remains concealed. Modernity, then, is not merely the triumph of reason but a complex dialectic wherein each revelation births new uncertainties, unsettling the boundaries between the known and the ineffable. This pervasive anxiety signals a cultural and existential struggle, an acute unease with the indomitable forces that lie beyond human mastery, and an inherent dread that knowledge itself, while illuminating, also casts deeper, unknowable shadows.

In Bram Stoker’s Dracula, the clash between burgeoning scientific rationality and the vestiges of ancient superstition becomes a potent framework that mirrors the keen anxieties of the late 19th century. As the Victorian era stood on the precipice of the modern age, advancements in science and technology heralded a new epoch, one that promised to illuminate the darkest corners of human ignorance. Yet, despite these strides, a deep, lingering unease persisted—a fear that certain mysteries could not be unravelled, that the shadows of the unknown would continue to stretch beyond the reach of science. Dracula, with its Gothic horror steeped in supernatural dread, thus serves as both a celebration of rationalism and an invocation of humanity’s primal fears—a tale that is as much about the limits of reason as it is about the terror of the uncanny.

The eponymous Count Dracula, a creature of the night, defies all that Victorian society would wish to catalogue, explain and control. He is both spectral and corporeal, a being suspended between life and death, who defies the laws of nature with impunity. The novel’s interplay between the rational and the supernatural is sharply rendered in Stoker’s characters, who personify the ideological schism between science and superstition. Dr Seward, with his psychiatric expertise, embodies Victorian faith in science’s power to classify and contain even the darkest aspects of the human psyche. However, his clinical mind falters when confronted with the vampiric malady that afflicts Lucy Westenra. Van Helsing, conversely, is as an intermediary figure—a learned man of science who still embraces the supernatural. Fluent in medicine and mysticism alike, he represents a figure not confined by the bounds of empirical knowledge alone but one willing to engage with the unknown. In this way, Van Helsing emerges as a harbinger of a new Gothic hero—one whose power lies in bridging two disparate worlds rather than embodying any single ideology.

The fear of the unknown finds a visceral modern resonance in the shadow of global pandemics. In a world where scientific advancement promises mastery over nature, the emergence of a deadly, unseen virus lays bare one’s vulnerability, rekindling a primal terror that lurks beneath one’s sophisticated veneer. Unlike visible threats, viral pandemics are insidious; they infiltrate the very air one breathes, defying one’s senses and challenging one’s ability to control one’s own environments. This unseen menace—like the Covid-19— upended economies, disrupted societies and isolated individuals within an echo chamber of anxiety, breeding a universal dread. Fear of the unknown magnifies in the face of viruses, which mutate, adapt and remain partially obscured even to the most advanced scientific scrutiny. The unpredictable nature of such viruses, alongside the limited understanding of their long-term impacts, contributes to a pervasive feeling of powerlessness, leaving society awash in suspicion and, at times, paranoia.

In this atmosphere, myths, misinformation and conspiracy theories proliferate, filling the gaps left by an incomplete scientific understanding. Thus, pandemics embody not only a physical threat but also an acutely psychological one—awakening the atavistic fear of the invisible and the untamable unknown.

More than a century on—and on the day we mark Bram Stoker’s death anniversary—Dracula still chills. It reverberates with metaphysical unease, questioning the very nature of knowledge and the shadows that exist beyond its reach. It reflects a society at odds with itself, torn between the gleaming promises of modernity and the haunting pull of the ancient. The terror of the unknown, like the bloofer lady herself, is always there, just out of sight.