Logo

Logo

Sweat and saliva must: Ashish Nehra, Harbhajan Singh against legalisation of ball-tampering

A report had stated that ICC is contemplating to partially legalise ball-tampering post COVID-19 in order to prevent the players from using saliva and sweat

Sweat and saliva must: Ashish Nehra, Harbhajan Singh against legalisation of ball-tampering

(Photo: Twitter/@ICC)

Veteran Indian cricketers Harbhajan Singh and Ashish Nehra have said that saliva and sweat are the required components to maintain the shine of the ball at a time when ICC is contemplating to partially legalise ball-tampering post COVID-19.

Earlier, an ESPNcricinfo report had stated that the officials were considering the use of artificial substances like vaseline to shine the ball in order to keep the players away from using saliva and sweat to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus.

“Get one thing clear at the onset. The ball will not swing if you don’t apply sweat or saliva on the ball. That’s a basic necessity of swing bowling. The moment ball gets scuffed up from one side, sweat and saliva must be applied on the other side,” Nehra, who completely shot down the idea of using external substances, told PTI.

Advertisement

Explaining the need to use saliva and sweat, the 2011 World Cup-winning pacer said that both were used to not only shine the ball but to make one side of it heavier as well which helps the ball to reverse swing. And according to him, the vaseline doesn’t do that.

“It (vaseline) is lighter and doesn’t even ensure conventional swing. It can keep the shine but doesn’t make the ball heavy,” Nehra added.

Harbhajan also agreed that saliva if one has already chewed mint, which has sugar in it, makes it heavier. But when it comes to using an external substance, he wants to know what can be the options.

“It’s not that murray mint can be used without putting it in your mouth. The coat of sugar on the saliva makes it heavier after one side gets scuffed. A scuffed-up ball is also good for spinners as it ensures a better grip than a shiny new ball. But my question is, if you allow, what’s the limit?

“Suppose you legalise ball-tampering and let people use a bottle cap. Now the ball starts reversing from the fifth over. Is it fair? Or maybe umpires come into play and they tell you now is the time when you can use an external substance.

“I mean, in any case, taking saliva out of the equation means taking swing out which may not be a good idea,” said the owner of 700-plus international wickets.

With PTI inputs

Advertisement