A troubling wave of denunciations in Russia has revived a practice reminiscent of one of the darkest chapters in Soviet history. Citizens, emboldened by rhetoric that glorifies patriotism and vilifies dissent, are turning against one another, fuelling a climate of fear and repression. This disturbing trend, epitomised by recent high-profile cases, reflects the deep societal fractures and authoritarian impulses shaping Russia today. Denunciations ~ accusations made by ordinary people against their neighbours, colleagues, or even strangers ~ were a hallmark of Stalinist purges. These accusations often had devastating consequences, leading to imprisonment, exile, or execution.

Today, under the guise of national security and wartime censorship laws, such practices are reemerging with alarming frequency. In the current context, they are being used to silence dissent, enforce conformity, and root out perceived internal enemies. Recent cases highlight the profound personal and professional toll of these denunciations. A veteran doctor with a distinguis – hed career was imprisoned following accusations based on little more than hearsay. Her case demonstrates how easily denunciations can be weaponised to destroy reputations and lives, even in the absence of substantial evidence. What is particularly unsettling is that the judicial system appears complicit, often disregarding due process in favour of politically motivated outcomes. This culture of mutual suspicion is not happening in isolation. It is a direct result of government rhetoric that equates dissent with treachery. Citizens are encouraged to report anyone who deviates from the official line, creating an atmosphere of paranoia.

Statements from the highest levels of leadership reinforce this mindset, framing the country’s current challenges as a battle not only against external enemies but also against internal “traitors.” The impact of this trend extends beyond the individuals targeted. It erodes trust within communities, creating a society where people are hesitant to express their opinions or even engage in casual conversations. For professionals in sensitive fields, such as medicine or education, the risks are particularly acute. Fear of being reported stifles open dialogue, innovation, and the willingness to serve in challenging environments. While the current wave of denunciations draws parallels with Soviet practices, it also has unique modern dimensions. Social media amplifies accusations, turning private grievances into public spectacles.

This digital dimension accelerates the spread of fear and enhances the state’s ability to monitor and control dissent. The revival of such practices is a stark warning of the dangers of authoritarianism. A society that prioritises loyalty to the state over fundamental rights and freedoms risks losing its humanity. The international community must recognise the broader implications of these developments, not only for Russia but also as a cautionary tale about how easily repression can resurface in any context. Ultimately, the resurgence of denunciations is a symptom of a deeper crisis ~ one that demands both domestic and global attention to safeguard the principles of justice, freedom, and human dignity