Indonesia, the world’s third-largest democracy, is once again in the throes of political unrest. Thousands of protesters have taken to the streets, demanding transparency and fairness in the country’s electoral process. This wave of protests comes at a critical juncture in Indonesian politics, as the long-serving President Joko Widodo, popularly known as Jokowi, prepares to hand over the reins to his successor, Prabowo Subianto, in October.

The unrest reveals deep concerns about the state of democracy in Indonesia, particularly the influence of political elites and the potential erosion of democratic norms. At the heart of the protests is a growing fear of political manoeuvring aimed at consolidating power within Jokowi’s circle. The outrage was sparked by a parliamentary attempt to amend election rules, a move that many view as a blatant attempt to favour Mr Jokowi’s allies and family members. The most contentious issue is the potential candidacy of Mr Jokowi’s 29-year-old son, Kaesang Pangarep, in regional elections. This has led to accusations of nepotism and fears that Indonesia’s democratic institutions are being undermined by the very leaders who are supposed to protect them. The protests reflect a broader anxiety about the trajectory of Indonesian democracy.

Mr Jokowi, who has been in power for a decade, has enjoyed significant popularity, but his influence now appears to be extending beyond his tenure. Critics argue that his efforts to secure a political future for his family members and close allies represent a worrying trend toward the concentration of power. This situation is reminiscent of other Southeast Asian nations where political dynasties and entrenched elites have stifled democratic progress. The role of the Election Commission has become a focal point in this struggle. Protesters are demanding that the commission issue clear and fair rules for candidate eligibility, free from political interference. The commission’s upcoming decisions will be critical in determining whether Indonesia’s elections remain a legitimate expression of the people’s will or become a tool for further entrenching the power of the ruling elite. The commission must uphold its duty to ensure a level playing field for all candidates, regardless of their political affiliations or family ties.

Beyond the immediate controversy over election rules, the protests also reflect a broader dissatisfaction with the state of governance in Indonesia. For many Indonesians, the situation highlights the persistent issues of corruption, nepotism, and the lack of accountability among the political elite. The fact that protesters have taken to the streets in multiple cities, braving tear gas and water cannons, is a testament to the depth of their frustration. As Mr Jokowi prepares to exit the political stage, his legacy is increasingly being called into question. Will he be remembered as a leader who strengthened Indonesia’s democracy, or as one who allowed it to be weakened by political manoeuvring? If Indonesia is to maintain its status as a vibrant democracy, it must resist the temptations of power consolidation and ensure that its institutions remain robust and independen