The introduction of generative AI into election campaigns ushers in a new era of unprecedented possibilities and concerns. The recent case in Indonesia sheds light on the transformative impact of AI, emphasizing its role in shaping electoral narratives, influencing voter sentiment, and redefining political personas. At the heart of this digital revolution is the use of AI to craft compelling campaign imagery, such as the endearing cartoon version of a once-feared special forces commander in Indonesia. This creative application of technology not only captures attention but also challenges traditional notions of political branding. The commander’s shift from a fiery nationalist image to a “gemoy” (cute and cuddly) persona, courtesy AI, exemplifies the malleability of political identities in the digital age. However, as with any technological advancement, the infusion of AI into electoral campaigns raises critical concerns. The lack of clear regulations in Indonesia accentuates the potential misuse of AI tools, with campaigns pushing boundaries set by AI providers. The challenge lies in striking a delicate balance between harnessing the power of AI for positive engagement and preventing its exploitation for manipulative purposes. The use of AI-generated content extends beyond mere imagery, encompassing sentiment analysis, interactive chatbots, and targeted voter outreach. While these tools offer efficiency and customisation, concerns arise about their ethical implications and potential impact on the democratic process. The risk of creating echo chambers and manipulating public opinion demands a careful examination of the boundaries within which AI should operate in the political arena. One positive aspect of this technological leap is the democratisation of campaigning tools. Smaller contenders gain access to sophisticated AI-driven strategies that were once exclusive to major players with substantial budgets. The ability of AI to generate hyper-localised content tailored to specific demographics empowers candidates in reaching diverse voter groups effectively. This inclusivity in campaigning tools levels the playing field and fosters a more dynamic and diverse political landscape. The Indonesian case also underscores the need for stringent regulations to govern the use of AI in elections. With countries representing a significant portion of the global population heading to the polls, the impact of AI on electoral processes cannot be underestimated. Clear guidelines, informed by ethical considerations, are imperative to prevent AI from becoming a double-edged sword that undermines the integrity of democratic practices. As AI continues to permeate election campaigns worldwide, the focus must extend beyond concerns to explore the potential benefits it brings. AI-driven tools can enhance civic engagement, provide personalised information to voters, and streamline communication between candidates and the electorate. The challenge lies in harnessing AI’s potential while safeguarding against its misuse for deceptive purposes. Striking this delicate balance requires a collaborative effort involving policymakers, tech companies, and the public to ensure that AI becomes a force for positive change in the democratic process rather than a tool for manipulation.