Will knock the door of SC if rights of Himachal Pradesh not given by the Centre: CM
Chief Minister Sukhwinder Singh Sukhu has said that he will meet the Union Ministers to release the aid to Himachal under the Post Disaster Need Assessment (PDNA).
Pendency of the case is not a ground for holding any case anywhere in the world, the top court said.
The Supreme Court on Monday said fugitive economic offender Vijay Mallya cannot use pendency of his plea in the top court to stall insolvency proceedings initiated against him by lenders in other countries. A bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde passed the order after the Centre told the court that Vijay Mallya used pendency of his plea to stall the UK court from delivering a verdict in insolvency proceedings.
Pendency of the case is not a ground for holding any case anywhere in the world, the top court said. “In view of the letter circulated by Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner, list these matters on January 10, 2020…subject to the condition that the pendency of these special leave petitions shall not be used as a cause for seeking adjournment in any matter before any Tribunal, Court or Authority anywhere,” said the bench, also comprising Justices BR Gavai and Surya Kant.
Advertisement
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, informed the court that proceedings in the UK in an insolvency case filed by SBI against Vijay Mallya, have been concluded and the order reserved.
Advertisement
Vijay Mallya’s lawyers have asked the UK court not to pass any order contending that the settlement proposal is pending in the top court here, Mehta said and asked the court to clarify the position.
The former liquor baron is currently in the UK where he has been charged by the Enforcement Directorate of defaulting on bank loans amounting to Rs 9,000 crore. He is facing extradition trial in the UK.
Mehta told the court that Vijay Mallya has been assuring the consortium of banks since 2013 that he will repay the money and not a single rupee has come from him to date.
Vijay Mallya had earlier moved the top court challenging the confiscation of properties belonging to the companies owned by him and his family members.
He said in the plea that no property other than that of Kingfisher Airlines, facing cases of alleged irregularities, should be attached.
On July 11, last year the Bombay High Court had refused to grant a stay on proceedings before a special court on confiscation of Vijay Mallya’s properties.
The division bench of the court had dismissed an application filed by Vijay Mallya last month, seeking a stay on the proceedings before the special court hearing cases pertaining to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
On January 5 last year, the special PMLA court in Delhi declared Vijay Mallya a fugitive economic offender. The court then started proceedings for confiscation of his properties.
Advertisement