Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail to Malayalam actor Siddique in rape case
In its decision, the Supreme Court bench highlighted the eight-year delay in filing the First Information Report (FIR) as a key reason for granting bail.
The Supreme Court on Thursday said the firecracker ban order needs to be strictly followed.
A bench headed by Justice M R Shah said it is not against any particular festival, but it is essential to protect the right to life.
The bench also comprising Justice A S Bopanna said: “We do not want to come in the way of enjoyment, but for enjoyment, one cannot play with the fundamental right of others.”
Advertisement
The bench added the authorities entrusted with the task to implement orders must show more responsibility. It clarified that it has not put a 100 per cent ban on firecrackers and all crackers were not banned, but celebration with firecrackers made from banned material should not be permitted.
The bench observed, “Can we say that enjoyment can be done at the cost of other’s lives? Today also we can see that crackers are being sold in the market”.
“We want full implementation of our orders. We are not against a particular community,” the bench said.
It further added that the court wants to send a strong message that it is there for the protection of fundamental rights of citizens.
The bench said it is not against any particular festival and also not against celebration, but it cannot permit anybody to play with the right to life of others in the guise of celebration.
“We have to enforce the previous orders… We know what people of Delhi are suffering…We want implementation of the court’s orders,” the bench said.
The hearing in the matter will continue on Friday.
The top court is hearing a plea in the firecrackers case, where it has sought reply from firecracker manufacturers, on a CBI preliminary enquiry report claiming manufacturers were using banned barium chemicals.
Advertisement
