The Yogi Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh seems defiant, even as the Allahabad High Court on Monday ordered the removal of hoardings with names, addresses and photos of persons accused of violence during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in December last year, the Lucknow administration has not removed the controversial hoardings.

On Monday, the HC further sought a compliance report of the Lucknow administration on the matter by March 16.

While ordering the removal of the hoardings, the court observed that the action by the UP government was an “unwarranted interference into the privacy of the people”.

News agency quoted sources as saying that the Chief Minister has asked the law officials to prepare a petition challenging the high court order which would be filed later this week.

Shalabh Mani Tripathi, media advisor to Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, said, “We are examining the Allahabad High Court order. It is being examined on what basis the order was passed to remove the posters. Our experts are examining it.”

He further said, “The government will decide what option to go for. The Chief Minister has to take the decision… But it is a fact that none of the people, who damaged public properties, will be spared.”

Another media adviser, Mritunjay Kumar, in a tweet, said, “The high court order on removing the posters of the rioters should be understood in the right perspective. Only their poster can be removed, not the cases filed against them.”

Admitting that the court is ‘above all’, he spoke of ‘many options’.

The state government had questioned the grounds of the High Court taking up the matter, contending that the court had ‘erred in invoking public interest jurisdiction’.

In response, the judges had said, ‘Courts are meant to impart justice and no court can shut its eyes if a public injustice is happening just before it’.

The judges said they were not concerned with the validity of the compensation, but ‘to the act against the disclosure of personal details of the accused persons’.

Pulling up the state government, the court, in its judgment, had said the issue in question was ‘not about personal injury’ to the persons named, but also the ‘injury caused to the precious constitutional value and its shameless depiction by the administration’.

The Lucknow district administration had on Friday started the process to shame as many as 57 people, identified for being allegedly involved in violence during the anti-CAA protest, by putting up hoardings with their names and addresses.

A total of 100 hoardings were being put up at all major crossings in the city.
The persons are from Hasanganj, Hazratganj, Kaiserbagh and Thakurganj police station areas of the state capital.

The accused had also been asked to pay for the damages to public and private property within a stipulated time, or have their properties attached by the district administration.

However, in a surprise move, the Allahabad High Court on Saturday took suo moto cognizance of the Lucknow administration’s action.

Chief Justice Govind Mathur also expressed hope that corrective action would be taken before the hearing begins He asked if the state government was not encroaching on personal space and liberty of citizens.

Contrary to expectations, the hoardings were not removed on Monday.
On Friday, sources in the Chief Minister’s Office had sent an unsigned two-page note justifying the hoardings. They said they were put up keeping larger public interest in mind and after following all rules.

The UP government’s move had attracted strong reactions from protesters, political parties, ordinary citizens, legal experts and social activists, who slammed the idea of public shaming in this manner.
In one particular photograph put up on the hoardings, the photograph of a minor was also seen.

In January, a UP court, in a major setback for the government, had granted bail to 48 people accused of rioting and attempted murder by the state police during the violent December protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act or CAA.

Making some scathing observations against the police investigation, the judge had said: “The police FIR says the mob fired at the cops, but no evidence has been presented in court to show any recovery of weapons.

“The government lawyers have failed to produce any evidence in court that shows that anyone part of the mob fired at the police.”

“Nor proof has been presented that any private vehicles or shops were vandalized, the judge said.

The violence that broke out in many parts of the state between December 19 and 21 has claimed as many as 21 lives.

Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had earlier in December said that his government will take revenge against those involved in the violence and will auction their properties to compensate for the losses.

(With agency inputs)