Australian all-rounder Moises Henriques dropped a new bomb in the on-going ball-tampering scandal, as he claimed that Steve Smith is lying about the ball-tampering plan.

Earlier, Smith had said in a press conference that Australian team’s ‘leadership group’ came up with the idea to cheat in the lunch interval on Day 3 of the third Test against South Africa in Cape Town. But now according to Henriques, there wasn’t really any meeting between the ‘leadership group’.

Aussie player Cameron Bancroft, who was the one to get caught on camera while tampering the balls, revealed that he got involved in the entire thing because he was in the ‘vicinity’.

Henriques in a series of tweet claimed that the entire story is cooked-up on Smith’s part.

“In my uneducated opinion, I dare say that there was never a senior players’ meeting to discuss cheating. Smith made that up to take the heat of a young Cameron Bancroft not realising the outrage that would follow,” Henriques wrote on Twitter.

“Not saying no one else was aware that it was going on, just saying I don’t think there was a so-called senior players meeting. Knowing him like I do, he would’ve done that to attempt to protect Cameron,” he added.

“Ps. Not saying no one was aware of Cameron doing it, just highly doubt there was a ‘senior players meeting’ to decide to cheat. I think it was the captain attempting to protect a young player. They had 10 mins of panic between end of play & press conference,” he concluded.

“Hate it when my grammar is poor. Apologies, meant to say ‘take the heat off*’ not ‘heat of’,” Henriques wrote on Twitter after posting series of tweets regarding the incident.

In my uneducated opinion, I dare say there was never a senior players meeting to discuss cheating – Smith made that up to take the heat of a young Cameron Bancroft not realising the outrage that would follow.

— Moises Henriques (@Mozzie21) March 26, 2018

Ps. Not saying no one was aware of Cameron doing it, just highly doubt there was a ‘senior players meeting’ to decide to cheat. I think it was the captain attempting to protect a young player. They had 10 mins of panic between end of play & press conference.

— Moises Henriques (@Mozzie21) March 26, 2018

Hate it when my grammar is poor. Apologies, meant to say ‘take the heat off*’ not ‘heat of’.

— Moises Henriques (@Mozzie21) March 26, 2018

Earlier in the day, Smith was handed a one-match suspension and fined 100 per cent of his match fee by ICC after he owned up to a ball-tampering conspiracy in South Africa, which plunged the sport into crisis leading to his ouster from the top job.

Smith admitted that he was party to a decision to attempt to change the condition of the ball in order to gain an unfair advantage during the third day’s play in the Cape Town Test against South Africa yesterday.

Additionally, Australia opener Cameron Bancroft has been fined 75 per cent of his match fee and handed three demerit points for breaching Level 2 of the ICC Code of Conduct during the third day’s play.

ICC Chief Executive David Richardson laid the charge against Smith under to Article 2.2.1 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel which prohibits to ‘all types of conduct of a serious nature that is contrary to the spirit of the game’.

Smith accepted the charge and the proposed sanction of two suspension points which equates to a ban for the next Test match and which will see four demerit points added to his record.

Richardson said: “The decision made by the leadership group of the Australian team to act in this way is clearly contrary to the spirit of the game, risks causing significant damage to the integrity of the match, the players and the sport itself and is therefore ‘serious’ in nature.

“As captain, Steve Smith must take full responsibility for the actions of his players and it is appropriate that he be suspended.”

Smith, who has established himself as the world’s premier Test batsman, has also often attracted attention for occasional serious lapses of judgement.

Richardson said, “The game needs to have a hard look at itself. In recent weeks we have seen incidents of ugly sledging, send-offs, dissent against umpires’ decisions, a walk-off, ball tampering and some ordinary off-field behaviour.

“The ICC needs to do more to prevent poor behaviour and better police the spirit of the game, defining more clearly what is expected of players and enforcing the regulations in a consistent fashion.”

The former South Africa stumper has called on the member nations to uphold the spirit of the game.

“In addition and most important member countries need to show more accountability for their teams’ conduct. Winning is important but not at the expense of the spirit of the game which is intrinsic and precious to the sport of cricket. We have to raise the bar across all areas.”

Bancroft admitted that he breached Article 2.2.9 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which relates to “changing the condition of the ball in breach of clause 41.3.” and accepted the sanction proposed by Andy Pycroft of the Elite Panel of ICC Match Referees, and as such there was no need for a formal hearing.

The incident that led to the charges being laid, took place during South Africa’s innings yesterday afternoon when Bancroft was seen on television holding a foreign object while rubbing the ball, before hiding the object in his pocket, then inside his trousers.

As soon as the incident was shown on the giant screen, the player was questioned in the presence of his captain Smith by the two on-field umpires, Richard Illingworth and Nigel Llong, who, along with third umpire Ian Gould and fourth umpire Allahudien Palekar, later charged Bancroft.

The umpires inspected the ball at that time and decided not to replace the ball and award a five-run penalty as they could not see any marks on the ball that suggested that its condition had been changed as a direct result of Bancroft’s actions.

The umpires though agreed that Bancroft’s actions were likely to alter the condition of the ball and he was therefore charged under Article 2.2.9.

Commenting on his decision, Pycroft said: “To carry a foreign object on to the field of play with the intention of changing the condition of the ball to gain an unfair advantage over your opponent is against not only the laws, but the spirit of the game as well.

“That said, I acknowledge that Cameron has accepted responsibility for his actions by pleading guilty to the charge and apologising publicly.

“As a young player starting out in international cricket, I hope the lessons learned from this episode will strongly influence the way he plays the game during the rest of his career.”

All Level 2 breaches carry a minimum penalty of a fine of between 50-100 per cent of the applicable match fee and/or up to two suspension points.